Skip to content

What if the grunt work handled itself?

Tax preparation outsourcing solves a capacity problem by creating a review problem. Juno's AI tax prep software reads your clients' source documents, extracts the data, and pushes it directly to Drake, Lacerte, ProConnect, CCH Axcess, and more, without anything leaving your firm. You stop being the last line of defense on every return.

TRUSTED WHERE YOU ALREADY WORK

drake-1
intuit lacerte-1
intuit proconnect-1
cch axcess-1
taxdome
k1x-2
rightworks-1
verito-2
aicpa and cima
naea (2)
natp (2)

How Juno compares to outsourcing

Work stays inside your firm
Juno
Outsourcing
Stays fast during busy season
Juno
Outsourcing
Targeted review, not full rechecking
Juno
Outsourcing
Catches errors before review
Juno
Outsourcing
Trains junior staff as they prep
Juno
Outsourcing
Built-in advisory and research
Juno
Outsourcing

Most firms consider outsourcing and automation for the same reason. You're buried in returns, short on staff, and trying to figure out how to take on more work without burning everyone out. The difference is how that capacity is created. Outsourcing gets you help by sending work to people. Juno gets you leverage by automating the grunt work itself.

Juno_Icon 001

Outsourcing labor vs. automation

Outsourcing models operate by sending your documents out to external teams who complete the work and send it back later, sometimes involving offshore labor that introduces disclosure and data-sharing considerations. Juno keeps everything inside your firm by automating prep, review, and analysis in real time. Documents are processed immediately and all work stays visible and under your control. The grunt work gets done without the work ever leaving your walls.

Juno_Icon 006

Still checking everything vs. focused review

Even when firms outsource prep, most still review all returned work before filing. That's not a reflection on the people doing the work. It's just the reality of external human-prepared returns and signing responsibility. Juno reduces how much checking you need by comparing source documents to the return and prior year, flagging mismatches and missing information so review is targeted instead of repetitive.

Untitled design (3)

A stopgap vs. a long-term system

For many smaller firms, outsourcing served as a way to take on more returns without hiring and helped bridge a short-term capacity gap. Juno is built as a long-term system that supports prep, review, and advisory in 1 place, so as your firm grows, you're not adding more outsourced labor. You're steadily removing the grunt work from the process.

Juno_Icon 009-1

Lower-cost labor vs. fewer errors to fix

Outsourcing can feel cheaper because it relies on lower-cost labor, but human-prepared work is still prone to errors and firms remain responsible for catching them. Juno reduces error risk by automatically handling comparisons and consistency checks, showing you what changed, what doesn't tie, and what needs attention before issues turn into amendments or late-night second guessing.

Juno_Icon 007

Training your team vs. renting capacity

Seasonal offshoring can help you push work through, but it doesn't build your team. The work leaves your firm and comes back finished, so junior staff never see how decisions were made. Juno keeps prep and review inside your firm, helping junior team members learn faster by seeing source documents, return fields, and review flags together. Over time, your team moves beyond the grunt work and spends more time on judgment, client conversations, and the work that actually develops strong professionals.

Continuous improvement vs. standing still

Busy-season delays vs. real-time results

Because outsourcing relies on human processing, turnaround times can vary, especially during February and March when volume spikes. Firms often describe waiting hours or days with limited visibility into timing or follow-up cleanup. Juno runs in real time with no external queue, so data is extracted, validated, and flagged immediately, and the pace stays consistent even during peak season. No more wondering when the grunt work will come back.

95%
Of data entry automated
10 min
Average time to process
50%
Less time per return

"I realized pretty quickly that even if we outsourced the work, we were still responsible for checking everything that came back. With Juno, at least I can see what changed and what actually needs review."

CPA

CPA

~700 returns/year

"The outsourced work alone wasn't enough to trust. We would've had to pay for human review on top of it before it was usable. Juno felt different because it was actually analyzing and flagging, not just reading numbers."

Tax accountant

Tax accountant

~200 returns/year

"I kept hearing that when things get really busy in February and March, outsourced turnaround times slow down. What I like about Juno is that it runs in real time, so we're not waiting on work to come back during our busiest weeks."

Director of operations

Director of operations

Mid-size firm

The bottom line

Firms that switch to Juno spend less time fixing preventable issues, move returns through review faster, and have clearer visibility into what actually needs attention. Instead of scaling by sending the grunt work out, they use automation to keep the work inside the firm, reduce manual effort, and build their team's ability to take on more responsibility without giving up control.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The core difference is automation vs. outsourcing. Outsourcing sends work to people who complete it and send it back. Juno automates prep and review inside your firm so the work never leaves your workflow and your team stays directly involved in how returns are built and reviewed.

Most firms experience outsourced prep as an offshoring model. Documents are uploaded, processed by individuals, and returned later, rather than handled automatically in real time.

With outsourcing, firms upload documents and the grunt work is completed by people outside the firm, then sent back for review. Because the work is done externally, firms still review everything to confirm accuracy and context. Juno takes a different approach by automating data entry and prep inside your firm, then narrowing review to only what truly needs attention with clear source-to-return context. The result isn't just faster prep and review. It's leverage. More work can be confidently handled by lower billing-rate team members, while senior staff focus on judgment, client conversations, and higher-value work.

Juno is faster during peak season because it runs in real time. Outsourcing relies on human processing, which can slow down when volume spikes in February and March.

Yes. Firms remain responsible for accuracy and typically recheck all outsourced work before filing. Juno is designed to reduce that burden by handling comparisons and consistency checks automatically and flagging anything that needs manual review.

For many firms, yes. Juno removes the need to send work out by automating the most time-consuming parts of prep and review while keeping judgment, learning, and decision-making inside your firm.

Pricing can be similar, but the scope is different. Juno covers prep, review, and advisory workflows that outsourcing models don't support.