TRUSTED WHERE YOU ALREADY WORK
.png)
.png)
.png)
Manual data entry vs. automated extraction
Manual prep starts with someone keying numbers off PDFs into tax software, often working through messy combined uploads or blurry iPhone photos of source docs. It's slow, error-prone, and the work scales linearly with volume. Juno extracts data from source docs automatically, including W-2s, 1099s, brokerage statements, federal and state K-1s, footnotes, and supporting schedules across 100+ document types, then pushes it into Drake, Lacerte, ProConnect, CCH Axcess, and more.
Line-by-line review vs. focused review
When prep is done by hand, review usually means reading every line because there's no way to know what was entered correctly and what wasn't. Juno compares source documents to the return and to prior year, then flags mismatches, missing information, and anomalies directly in the Binder. Review stops being a full reread and starts being a targeted look at what actually needs your attention.
.png)
Late nights vs. real-time prep
Manual prep concentrates the work into the hours after documents arrive. That's how busy season turns into 60-hour weeks and double-checking PDFs at midnight. Juno runs in real time. Drop in bulk PDFs and the data is classified, extracted, and validated immediately, so prep is ready when your team sits down instead of waiting at the end of the day. The average return takes about 10 minutes to complete in Juno.
Catching errors at review vs. flagging them upfront
When data entry is manual, errors usually surface late in the workflow, during review or worse, after filing. That means amendments, client follow-ups, and the kind of rework that erodes trust. Juno handles source-to-return comparisons and consistency checks automatically, surfacing what doesn't tie before it becomes a problem. You're catching issues where they're cheap to fix instead of after the return goes out.
Junior staff stuck on grunt work vs. learning through context
Manual prep tends to lock junior team members into data entry, where they spend hours keying numbers without seeing how decisions are made. Juno keeps prep and review inside your firm and shows source documents, return fields, and review flags together. Admin can do up to 90% of prep, and your team learns faster because they're seeing the connection between the source doc and the return, not just the typing.
More hours and headcount vs. real leverage
The default response to volume in a manual workflow is more people or more hours. Both have a ceiling, and both come with margin pressure. Juno gives firms leverage instead. Customers report 50% less time per return, with admin doing up to 90% of prep before a preparer ever touches the file. The team you already have can take on more without burning out.
"Before, review meant reading every line and hoping I'd catch the mistake. Now I'm only looking at what changed from prior year or doesn't tie back to a source doc. It's the difference between rechecking everything and reviewing what actually matters."
Reviewer
Mid-size firm
"We were keying numbers off PDFs at 11 p.m. and hoping nothing got transposed. With Juno, the data is already in by the time I sit down to review, and I can see exactly where each number came from."
CPA
~400 returns/year
"Our admin used to do nothing on returns because there was no safe way to hand off data entry. Now they do 90% of prep before a preparer ever touches it. We didn't add headcount. We just stopped wasting the headcount we had."
Firm owner
~7000 returns/year
"Before, review meant reading every line and hoping I'd catch the mistake. Now I'm only looking at what changed from prior year or doesn't tie back to a source doc. It's the difference between rechecking everything and reviewing what actually matters."
Reviewer
Mid-size firm
"We were keying numbers off PDFs at 11 p.m. and hoping nothing got transposed. With Juno, the data is already in by the time I sit down to review, and I can see exactly where each number came from."
CPA
~400 returns/year
"Our admin used to do nothing on returns because there was no safe way to hand off data entry. Now they do 90% of prep before a preparer ever touches it. We didn't add headcount. We just stopped wasting the headcount we had."
Firm owner
~7000 returns/year
"Before, review meant reading every line and hoping I'd catch the mistake. Now I'm only looking at what changed from prior year or doesn't tie back to a source doc. It's the difference between rechecking everything and reviewing what actually matters."
Reviewer
Mid-size firm
"We were keying numbers off PDFs at 11 p.m. and hoping nothing got transposed. With Juno, the data is already in by the time I sit down to review, and I can see exactly where each number came from."
CPA
~400 returns/year
"Our admin used to do nothing on returns because there was no safe way to hand off data entry. Now they do 90% of prep before a preparer ever touches it. We didn't add headcount. We just stopped wasting the headcount we had."
Firm owner
~7000 returns/year